Dashel Drasher demotion reversed following appeal hearing
Connections of Dashel Drasher have won their appeal against the decision of the local stewards to demote him from second place to third in the Paddy Power Stayers’ Hurdle at the Cheltenham Festival.
The gelding, trained by Jeremy Scott, was a 40-1 chance for the contest when ridden by Rex Dingle in the three-mile Grade One in March.
The 10-year-old led into the final flight but drifted left on the approach, with the stewards deeming this movement to have interfered with the challenge mounted by Gordon Elliott’s Teahupoo.
The eventual winner, Sire Du Berlais, was three-quarters of a length clear at the line and was not involved, but Teahupoo missed out by just a nose and the stewards considered that margin to be equal to or greater than the ground he had lost due to the alleged interference.
As a result the placings were reversed after an inquiry on the day, with the Rex Dingle-ridden Dashel Drasher demoted to third and Teahupoo instated as the runner-up.
The Dashel Drasher team have lodged a Stayers’ Hurdle appeal after being demoted to third.
Read more >>> https://t.co/yZjdviFhf7 pic.twitter.com/9Io0vyGpNq
— Racing TV (@RacingTV) March 23, 2023
Scott represented himself, with his argument heard by an independent British Horseracing Authority panel comprising of James O’Mahony, Alison Royston and Dr Lyn Griffiths.
Charlotte Davison, representing the BHA, defended the stewards’ decision and called Davy Russell, rider of Teahupoo, to give evidence.
Russell felt that not only was his chance of finishing second scuppered, but also that his horse would have gone on to win the race had the suggested interference not taken place.
“My route has been dictated by the horse on my outside (Dashel Drasher) because I’ve no other option, he’s drifting to the left,” he said.
“I can pull my right rein and collide with him, which is something that is not going to go to my advantage or to Mr Dingle’s advantage.
“I pull across and came up a length and a half from that point in distance, if I had a straight run I feel not only would I have finished in front of him but I would have won the race.”
Scott called Dingle to give his account of the race, with the rider pointing out that Flooring Porter was also drifting left and suggesting that had set in motion Teahupoo’s crooked jump at the last.
He said: “Flooring Porter is intimidating Teahupoo, we were clear in distance from Teahupoo and Mr Russell has not had to stop riding at all.
“From turning in until after the last, he’s had several opportunities to get by me, Dashel Drasher is idling but he is always holding Teahupoo.”
It was Scott’s position that there was no interference at all, which would negate any discussions on the effect of the interference or the relevance of the margin between the two horses when they crossed the line.
“We have spent nearly three hours discussing a five-second clip of racing in the context of a three-mile race, probably the most competitive staying race of the season in England,” Scott said.
“The notion that there is not going to be a certain amount of wavering going towards the last hurdle, to enable horses to correct themselves, to jump the hurdle safely, is ridiculous.
“This is not a Flat race, this is a jumping race and we put hurdles in the way to make it more interesting and, in my view, more fun.
“If we are going to penalise every horse that makes the slightest of errors or the slightest of movements going into a hurdle, then we may as well remove them.
“If he’d (Teahupoo) jumped that hurdle on a spot-on stride, then I’ve no doubt he would have got away from the hurdle as quickly as we did, but he didn’t because the horse made a mistake.
“The mistake may or may not have been caused by Davy Russell trying to pull his horse further left, but I don’t believe that it was Dashel Drasher that caused that interference.”
The panel retired to consider the evidence and returned to state they agreed with Scott’s submission that there had been no interference and therefore the stewards’ decision was to be overturned.
O’Mahony said: “We take judicial notice of the fact that in approaching hurdles, horses cannot be expected always to run straight. We’ve watched carefully the approach to that last hurdle and, although Teahupoo stayed on, we find he was demonstrably a tiring horse at that stage.
“Mr Russell used the whip three times in his approach to that final hurdle. We find he made more of a move laterally left in order to find a better stride in his approach to the hurdle.
“We conclude there was no interference because Dashel Drasher was clear. We have regard not just to the distance straight ahead but to the distance laterally. With the clearest evidence in our view from the tracker footage, there was daylight in both aspects.”
The decision was not well received by Brian Acheson of Robcour Racing, owners of Teahupoo, who described the panel’s finding as “absolute rubbish” and added: “To the three independent stewards, absolute rubbish. You want to get someone murdered.”
